Economics

This is a nexus page filled with ideas and perspectives to be drafted/proposed for their own page creation.

Only documentation related to organizing scarce stuff belongs here.


Specifying currency's involvement

Clarification

"Saving" money creates a DoS vulnerability in an economy.
"Storing" economic influence, is said instead to not-forget about this consequence.

"Algorithms" defines and distinguishes different cryptocurrency networks.
"Markets" are defined by cultural morals and legal rules, which sum up a social algorithm.
When describing styles of cryptocurrency, grouping similars as "Markets" rather than "Algorithms" or "Networks" is to not-forget morals are what distinguish these styles.

"Stake" implies economic influence depending on the economic influence of hoarded things.
"Flipping" trade-ables maintains the hoard while gaining influence.
"Sybil" identities form from difficult-to-replicate-reputations.
They are not restricted to one identity per physical body.

"Proof-of-Sybil" is the opposite of "Proof-of-Work", shifting trust from the difficulty of making an anonymous-token to the difficulty of having a supported-identity.

After mapping difficult events to sybils, those same sybils can be given weight in a consensus algorithm.
Where ever we talk about blockchains, consensus algorithms applies abstractly.

"Entertaining" creates an anti-pattern debias in a decision-making entity.
"Entropy" feeding neural nets, is said instead to not-forget about this basic need.

Deus ex;ob Machinae properly interprets as authority of,-because-of mechanics. "Entropy Agents", "Agents-of-Culture", or Nietzsche's "Ubermensch", generate cause for why currency.

Maximal diversity of economic influence enables maximal utilization for production of entropy, simply set conversions of basic materials wouldn't be sufficient for more than minimal entropy.

Cryptocurrency as a store of economic influence

Bitcoin, and like Proof-of-Work markets, are ecologically expensive.
Proof-of-Sybil markets are not ecologically expensive.

Examples in the Wild
  • Urbit isn't a blockchain, but is an example of a network creating sybil identities which a consensus algorithm "could" make, a map for varying levels of voting weight, with.
  • Ripple and Ethereum Casper (both very poorly documented: esoteric)
  • GNUnet isn't a blockchain, but is an example of a network creating sybil identities which a consensus algorithm could make, a map for varying levels of voting weight, with.

Cryptocurrency as a flipping-device

Weapons of plunder include what trigger mechanisms causing agents of economic influence to trade differently any way, any degree predictably.


Describing the importance of Gratifying our Enablers

Clarification

"Art" means creating ways ideas spread.
An "Organ" can be identified by recording mappable memories of vaguely-potential-along-side-actual relationships.

To "Gratify" is to make a feeling of validation caused by reciprocation, when one does what another would do and another does what one would do.
"Expense" sums up what is consumable by creation both directly and indirectly.

"Technologies" process input yielded as output set modes which define them.

Art growing an organ as gratification